adversity apostasy church cross deception discernment false prophets following christ hearing humanism offense sacrifice seeing suffering troubles understanding

The Old Cross and the New

By A.W. Tozer

All unannounced and mostly undetected there has come in modern times a new cross into popular evangelical circles. It is like the old cross, but different: the likenesses are superficial; the differences, fundamental.

From this new cross has sprung a new philosophy of the Christian life, and from that new philosophy has come a new evangelical technique—a new type of meeting and a new kind of preaching. This new evangelism employs the same language as the old, but its content is not the same and its emphasis not as before.

The old cross would have no truck with the world. For Adam’s proud flesh it meant the end of the journey. It carried into effect the sentence imposed by the law of Sinai. The new cross is not opposed to the human race; rather, it is a friendly pal and, if understood aright, it is the source of oceans of good clean fun and innocent enjoyment.

It lets Adam live without interference. His life motivation is unchanged; he still lives for his own pleasure, only now he takes delight in singing choruses and watching religious movies instead of singing bawdy songs and drinking hard liquor. The accent is still on enjoyment, though the fun is now on a higher plane morally if not intellectually.

The new cross encourages a new and entirely different evangelistic approach. The evangelist does not demand abnegation of the old life before a new life can be received. He preaches not contrasts but similarities. He seeks to key into public interest by showing that Christianity makes no unpleasant demands; rather, it offers the same thing the world does, only on a higher level. Whatever the sin-mad world happens to be clamoring after at the moment is cleverly shown to be the very thing the gospel offers, only the religious product is better.

The new cross does not slay the sinner, it redirects him. It gears him into a cleaner and jollier way of living and saves his self-respect. To the self-assertive it says, “Come and assert yourself for Christ.” To the egotist it says, “Come and do your boasting in the Lord.” To the thrillseeker it says, “Come and enjoy the thrill of Christian fellowship.” The Christian message is slanted in the direction of the current vogue in order to make it acceptable to the public.

The philosophy back of this kind of thing may be sincere but its sincerity does not save it from being false. It is false because it is blind. It misses completely the whole meaning of the cross.

The old cross is a symbol of death. It stands for the abrupt, violent end of a human being. The man in Roman times who took up his cross and started down the road had already said good-by to his friends. He was not coming back. He was going out to have it ended. The cross made no compromise, modified nothing, spared nothing; it slew all of the man, completely and for good. It did not try to keep on good terms with its victim. It struck cruel and hard, and when it had finished its work, the man was no more.

The race of Adam is under death sentence. There is no commutation and no escape. God cannot approve any of the fruits of sin, however innocent they may appear or beautiful to the eyes of men. God salvages the individual by liquidating him and then raising him again to newness of life.

That evangelism which draws friendly parallels between the ways of God and the ways of men is false to the Bible and cruel to the souls of its hearers. The faith of Christ does not parallel the world, it intersects it. In coming to Christ we do not bring our old life up onto a higher plane; we leave it at the cross. The corn of wheat must fall into the ground and die.

We who preach the gospel must not think of ourselves as public relations agents sent to establish good will between Christ and the world. We must not imagine ourselves commissioned to make Christ acceptable to big business, the press, the world of sports or modern education. We are not diplomats but prophets, and our message is not a compromise but an ultimatum.

God offers life, but not an improved old life. The life He offers is life out of death. It stands always on the far side of the cross. Whoever would possess it must pass under the rod. He must repudiate himself and concur in God’s just sentence against him. What does this mean to the individual, the condemned man who would find life in Christ Jesus? How can this theology be translated into life? Simply, he must repent and believe. He must forsake his sins and then go on to forsake himself. Let him cover nothing, defend nothing, excuse nothing. Let him not seek to make terms with God, but let him bow his head before the stroke of God’s stern displeasure and acknowledge himself worthy to die.

Having done this let him gaze with simple trust upon the risen Saviour, and from Him will come life and rebirth and cleansing and power. The cross that ended the earthly life of Jesus now puts an end to the sinner; and the power that raised Christ from the dead now raises him to a new life along with Christ.

To any who may object to this or count it merely a narrow and private view of truth, let me say God has set His hallmark of approval upon this message from Paul’s day to the present. Whether stated in these exact words or not, this has been the content of all preaching that has brought life and power to the world through the centuries. The mystics, the reformers, the revivalists have put their emphasis here, and signs and wonders and mighty operations of the Holy Ghost gave witness to God’s approval.

Dare we, the heirs of such a legacy of power, tamper with the truth? Dare we with our stubby pencils erase the lines of the blueprint or alter the pattern shown us in the Mount? May God forbid. Let us preach the old cross and we will know the old power.


The European Prophetic College

3 replies on “The Old Cross and the New”

How sadly true it is my friend. It is indeed the cross that separates the real from the counterfeit. As Art Katz once said "if I had a zipper in my chest I could take my heart out and wring it" and I am sure the Lord feels that a million times more.


Thanks for the feedback.

That was a great article by Tozer. There is no doubt that he spoke much prophetic truth into this time we call the "last days." If I could add anything to what he said it would be in the first sentence where he states,

All unannounced and mostly undetected there has come in modern times a new cross into popular evangelical circles.

The announcement came as early as Jesus' preaching to His disciples, and followed-up by those very disciples in their preaching to the new Church. Since the days of Constantine the Church has morphed so many times and deception flourished, that we truly think that what we see on every corner today is the finished product of what God originally intended. If the Church today is what God intended then we can rightly say that God's ways and man's ways are the same, and that when God said that His ways are not man's ways, He was mistaken. This new cross of modern Christendom is the rubber stamp version, a replica, it is a cross by proxy, and has nothing to do with the baptism of death, which Jesus and the Apostles preached.

The old Cross is here, but according to God's ways, not man's, and it looks nothing like the brick and mortar, or the attendance based corporate structures that have flooded our hearts and minds and blocked out the old Cross.

If I had a zipper in my chest I would take out that old stony heart and replace it with a heart of flesh, but only the Spirit can do that by, allowing Light to shine out of darkness; it is a new creation, a miracle, not a MANufactured organization, and only God can give meaning to the Cross, and only God can build a living body called "the Church."

Thanks again,

Steve Blackwell

Your words “We must not imagine ourselves commissioned to make Christ acceptable to big business, the press, the world of sports or modern education.” reminded me of the late Rob Briner’s book “Final Roar”. He obviously believed much differently. I agree with you, though. Our task is not to make the Gospel acceptable and comfortable. We must wake people up with it, or they will remain blinded by the god and the distractions of this world. God help us to do that!

Your last paragraph reminds me that the majority of Christian denominations have long since written out the commandment to be baptized after believing and repenting based on faith in the redemptive work of Christ. Not to mention that most church goers have no idea what you mean by “life out of death”. Most have not “died” because they don’t understand the new birth any better than Nicodemus did. And that is not just the fault of their hireling preachers; it’s the people’s fault they don’t seek the truth for themselves.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.